Interviews and Call for Submissions

This session's goal was to continue with the research, outline our goals for the project, and begin production. As a group, we prioritize examining the material we gather from primary sources, as we want the data to guide the direction of our project. Therefore we began the session by reviewing the two recorded interviews that Sumeya and Atiya conducted since our last meeting.

Of the two realized interviews, one of them was of Atiya's and Sumeya's fellow Diva Girl, Fazra. The other was of their friend from school, Maryam. Although both of these interviewees are girls around the age of sixteen, they have unique connections to their religion and lived experiences. We were impressed by the professionalism that the girls demonstrated during the interview process while questioning their friends, a task that can be difficult to do. 

In the middle of the session, Brittany, Atiya, and Sumeya walked around Regent Park, visiting and taking photos of places that our Diva Girls feel best represents their religious expression within their neighbourhood. While we are also working alongside Atiya and Sumeya, we also value their responses as Regent Park residents from whom we wish to learn.

We recapped the thematic ideas and premise for the project that we established last week and fleshed them out in more detail. We further focused our project on showcasing the lived experiences of Regent Park youth, and thus want our website to be as inclusive and interactive as possible for the young contributors and intended audience.

Photo taken by Sumeya

Photo taken by Sumeya

As such, we decided that our website will feature artistic crowd-sourced content that visually depicts the feelings of in-betweenness that youth from Regent Park experience. Alejandra is creating the online submission portal through which Regent Park youth can share their depictions of their religious in-betweenness (in the form of drawings, photographs, writing, etc.).

For next week, we have tasked Atiya and Sumeya with conducting four more interviews together using the updated questions below:

  1. What is your religion?

  2. Do you consider yourself religious?

  3. How do you feel that religion is portrayed to other people?

  4. How does it feel to practice your faith in Regent Park?

  5. How does it feel outside of Regent Park?

  6. From the experiences you described, which places in Regent Park were you thinking about?

We refined our interview questions from last week based on feedback from Professor Mehta, as our initial question of "How close are you to your religion?" was not producing a meaningful answer that we could analyze. Therefore we broke that question up into parts that would serve as a funnel to understand the interviewee's point of view from a general statement to a more specific one. We also added a final interview question to learn which places around Regent Park interviewees reference. We want to have tangible places in the neighbourhood to visit, study, and take photographs.

It was challenging to find the right words to formulate the interview questions, as well as the text that will be used to crowd-source artistic submissions. Although we know what kind of response or information we would like to garner, it is difficult to know which language would be best understood by participants. Additionally, although we have some idea in our minds about what people may share based on what we have learned so far about Regent Park residents' experiences, we never want to ask questions that assume an answer. We want to approach people with open minds, without any preconceptions about their lived experiences.

Professor Mehta shared with us two sites of media projects that followed natural disasters that are very relevant to us. These two websites are excellent models of what we want to create for this project:

The online submission portal is now live at https://pointsofintersection.wixsite.com/regentpark. To raise awareness about our project to attract submissions, we will be reaching out to youth community groups and encouraging all of the Diva Girls to share the link on their social media. Our team is excited to see what young residents of Regent Park will submit!

Members of POI: Points of Intersection are Alejandra, Atiya, Brittany, Nathan, and Sumeya.

In-Betweenness in Toronto/Regent Park

During this session, our group aimed to identify the format of our project, develop an implementation plan, and begin researching how people experience in-betweenness in Toronto/Regent Park.

When discussing the media format that we wanted our final project to take, both Atiya and Sumeya voiced an interest in taking photos. In a previous meeting, when the Diva Girls were not present, our group had discussed the possibility of creating a zine. However, Atiya and Sumeya were not as excited about the idea. When they learned that our thinking behind creating a zine was motivated by our interest in having the girls directly contribute to the project through their own pieces without filtering their thoughts through us, they were very receptive to the format.

Through further discussion, we realized we wanted a format that was more up-to-date and accessible to today's youth. As such, we plan to produce a multimedia webpage instead, where we can still feature a variety of individual pieces, like a zine, but in a more interactive and relevant medium.

With Professor Mehta’s support, we came up with four questions that we will use to interview Regent Park residents about how they experience in-betweenness in Toronto/Regent Park. The questions are as follows:

  1. How close are you to your religion?

  2. How do you feel that religion is portrayed to other people?

  3. How does it feel to practice your faith in Regent Park?

  4. How does it feel outside of Regent Park?

We tested the above questions with both Atiya and Sumeya to ensure that they are easily understood by those being interviewed to ensure that we can increase the likelihood of capturing meaningful responses. We both recorded and typed key takeaways from the interviews to obtain the most accurate qualitative data.

Our proposed project timeline for next week consists of our Diva Girls interviewing at least two of their friends and/or family members by our next meeting on March 9. We sent them the interview questions the following day on our group chat with a reminder to record the interview with their interviewee's consent as well as to document their first name, last initial, and age. Depending on how many people the girls interview this week, we will continue conducting interviews in the following weeks. Atiya and Sumeya will continue interviewing their social network on their own, in addition to the group speaking with the Diva Girls from other groups during class to garner additional content as needed. We plan that our Diva Girls will interview at least five people each, with the goal to interview as many as ten in total. 

Proposed Timeline

Screenshot (140).png

On a personal level, through various icebreaker games and getting their opinions on the project, we were able to connect on a deeper level with our Diva Girls. By learning about not just their life stories (the icebreaker) but also what they are interested in on a creative level, helped us better tailor the project to make sure that they can contribute equally and in a way that's meaningful to them. Though it was initially a bit difficult to get that "buy-in" from Sumeyia and Attiya, bringing up more relevant platforms for the project as well as examples of how it could look allowed us to "breakthrough" and hit a stride near the end of our meeting. We recognize this was only our second meeting in which we directly worked with them and that the process of getting to know them will take time. Still, the experience this week was immensely gratifying and leaves us even more excited for next week!

Post by TikToker Aabida, 2020

Post by TikToker Aabida, 2020

here are many resources we can look to when creating our webpage, as there is relevant content on social media platforms, including TikTok. The city and social experiences are very complex, and we must approach them with a curious and open mind and absorb all the information we can gather to then respond to or address what we inference from that. As we are collaborating as a group, it is essential to make decisions that the majority is happy, and that makes sense for the project, considering all opinions. Though sometimes one's idea may not be preferred/feasible, it is important to continue supporting the direction that the project is taking with enthusiasm. As we are looking to produce something by looking at many sources of information, the opinion and support of our professor and the Regent Park support staff are a great source to receive feedback.

POI: Points of Intersection members are Alejandra, Atiya, Brittany, Nathan, and Sumeya.